15.2 Photobiological Agents and Methods Used in PhotoBiological Reactors
231
was achieved in both PSBRs (photoperiods of 24 hours continuous illumination
and 16 hours/8 hours L/D). Longer lighting period favored the growth of biomass,
which resulted in 43% more total organic carbon (TOC) production in the same
photoperiod. It demonstrates that the use of algae–bacteria consortia requires less
energy to treat NH4
+-N-loaded wastewater, and this method should be further
enhanced to make it more sustainable and cost-effective [14].
15.2.1.13
Detection of sul1 and sul2 Genes in Sulfonamide-Resistant Bacteria
(SRB) from Sewage, Aquaculture Sources, Animal Wastes, and Hospital
Wastewater
The extensive use of antibiotics has placed a lot of selective pressure on bacteria of
different environments. Recent study aimed at detecting the occurrence of sulfon-
amide resistance genes and antibiogram of sulfonamide-resistant bacteria (SRB)
isolated from sewage, aquaculture sources, animal wastes, and hospital wastewater.
In this method, SRB were isolated on medium incorporated with sulfadiazine (SDZ).
Antibiotic susceptibility was carried out using disc diffusion method, and detection
of sul1, sul2, and sul3 genes was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using
specific primers. The results showed 48 SRBs, out of which 8 were from aquaculture,
16 from animal wastes, 10 from hospital wastewater, and 14 from sewage. They
belong to 16 genera with Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp. In the Gram-negative
SRB, there was 100% resistance to ertapenem, tetracycline (77.5%), ampicillin
(75%), cefpodoxime (47.5%), streptomycin (27.5%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (22.5%),
ciprofloxacin (22.5%), imipenem (15%), cefotaxime (12.5%), and ceftazidime (7.5%),
and in Gram-positive SRB, there was 100% resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, and
ertapenem while 50% resistance to cefpodoxime and 12.5% resistance to imipenem,
and no resistance was observed to amoxicillin-clavulanate and ciprofloxacin. Most
(85.4%; 41 out of 48) of the SRB were multidrug resistant (MDR). The sul1 was
noticed in P. aeruginosa H19A (isolated from hospital wastewater), Bacillus sp.
AQE3 (aquaculture pond), and Leclercia sp. S5C (sewage) while sul2 was detected
in P. aeruginosa PG4A (animal waste) and Klebsiella sp. S6C (sewage). None of
the SRB harbored sul3, and no co-occurrence of the sul genes was observed. The
source sampled in the study is an important media for the proliferation of MDR
bacteria and resistance genes and revealed a high pervasiveness of MDR SRB in
hospital wastewater, sewage, animal wastes, and aquaculture wastewater. More
studies should be carried out on other potential antibiotic reservoirs and environ-
ments for the discovery of novel sulfonamide resistance genes and the molecular
characteristics of isolates possessing these genes [15].
15.2.1.14
Photosynthetic Bacteria as a Potential Alternative to Meet
Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Requirement
Conventional activated sludge (CAS) process as the core to wastewater treatment
is challenged with severe problems such as high energy consumption, sludge
disposal, and inevitable greenhouse gas emission, which will posture a grave impact
on the present wastewater industry. Photosynthetic bacteria (PSB) serve as an
alternative to these impacts and have flexible metabolic modes and high tolerance,